A Capability Maturity Model for Research Data Management

Changes for document 2.4 Process Assessment

Last modified by Arden Kirkland on 2014/06/03 16:52
From version 7.2
edited by Arden Kirkland
on 2014/03/12 14:08
To version 8.1
edited by Arden Kirkland
on 2014/03/13 12:33
Change comment: starting to add sources

Content changes

... ... @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
21 21
22 22 (% style="font-size: 14px;" %)Supervisors should review and sign off on data to signify completeness and accuracy.
23 23
24 -Codes should be recorded in the data file to represent the quality of data at the time quality is assessed. Problematic data should be flagged to indicate known issues. Any ancillary data used to assess data quality should be described and stored.
24 +Codes should be recorded in the data file to represent the quality of data at the time quality is assessed **(Source 35)**. Problematic data should be flagged to indicate known issues (**Source 49)**. Any ancillary data used to assess data quality should be described and stored (**Source 35)**.
25 25
26 26 == 2.4.3 Check data integration from other sources ==
27 27

XWiki Enterprise 5.1-milestone-1 - Documentation